Review



next generation i cat dental cbct scanner  (Imaging Sciences International)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Imaging Sciences International next generation i cat dental cbct scanner
    Next Generation I Cat Dental Cbct Scanner, supplied by Imaging Sciences International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/next+generation+i+cat+dental+cbct+scanner/pmc13176749-168-15-20?v=Imaging+Sciences+International
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    next generation i cat dental cbct scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    next generation i cat dental cbct scanner  (Imaging Sciences International)
    86
    Imaging Sciences International next generation i cat dental cbct scanner
    Next Generation I Cat Dental Cbct Scanner, supplied by Imaging Sciences International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/next+generation+i+cat+dental+cbct+scanner/pmc13176749-168-15-20?v=Imaging+Sciences+International
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    next generation i cat dental cbct scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    i-cat next generation dental cbct scanner  (Imaging Sciences International)
    90
    Imaging Sciences International i-cat next generation dental cbct scanner
    I Cat Next Generation Dental Cbct Scanner, supplied by Imaging Sciences International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/next+generation+i+cat+dental+cbct+scanner/pm28411007-55-10-16?v=Imaging+Sciences+International
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    i-cat next generation dental cbct scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    dental cbct scanner i-cat next generation cbct  (Imaging Sciences International)
    90
    Imaging Sciences International dental cbct scanner i-cat next generation cbct
    Experimental setups for all three CT imaging scanners. (a) The adolescent head phantom positioned within the head holder of the <t>Toshiba</t> <t>Aquilion</t> One scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its posterior hole; the towel is used to immobilize the phantom. (b) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the i-CAT Next Generation <t>CBCT</t> scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = − 80 mm . (c) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the CS 9300 CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = + 40 mm .
    Dental Cbct Scanner I Cat Next Generation Cbct, supplied by Imaging Sciences International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/next+generation+i+cat+dental+cbct+scanner/pmc05621782-50-27-34?v=Imaging+Sciences+International
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dental cbct scanner i-cat next generation cbct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    next-generation i-cat dental cbct scanner  (Imaging Sciences International)
    90
    Imaging Sciences International next-generation i-cat dental cbct scanner
    Experimental setups for all three CT imaging scanners. (a) The adolescent head phantom positioned within the head holder of the <t>Toshiba</t> <t>Aquilion</t> One scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its posterior hole; the towel is used to immobilize the phantom. (b) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the i-CAT Next Generation <t>CBCT</t> scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = − 80 mm . (c) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the CS 9300 CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = + 40 mm .
    Next Generation I Cat Dental Cbct Scanner, supplied by Imaging Sciences International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/next+generation+i+cat+dental+cbct+scanner/pmc03667542-143-6-11?v=Imaging+Sciences+International
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    next-generation i-cat dental cbct scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Experimental setups for all three CT imaging scanners. (a) The adolescent head phantom positioned within the head holder of the Toshiba Aquilion One scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its posterior hole; the towel is used to immobilize the phantom. (b) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the i-CAT Next Generation CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = − 80 mm . (c) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the CS 9300 CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = + 40 mm .

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental setups for all three CT imaging scanners. (a) The adolescent head phantom positioned within the head holder of the Toshiba Aquilion One scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its posterior hole; the towel is used to immobilize the phantom. (b) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the i-CAT Next Generation CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = − 80 mm . (c) The experimental setup of the SEDENTEXCT DI dose index phantom positioned on the tripod in the CS 9300 CBCT scanner with the thimble chamber inserted into its anterior hole and aligned to z = + 40 mm .

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques: Imaging

    Scatter dose percentages for Toshiba MSCT scanner (left) and i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner (right) in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms at different scan lengths. The scatter dose percentages are calculated using the three parameters ( D eq , α , and L eq ) from the AAPM fit [Eqs. (2)–(4)] in the central hole.

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter dose percentages for Toshiba MSCT scanner (left) and i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner (right) in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms at different scan lengths. The scatter dose percentages are calculated using the three parameters ( D eq , α , and L eq ) from the AAPM fit [Eqs. (2)–(4)] in the central hole.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques:

    Summary of the three parameters D eq , L eq , and α from the AAPM fit in (a) Toshiba MSCT scanner and (b) i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner. (a) For each patient group, the D eq values from thimble chamber measurements are very close to each other, with the highest being present in the child head phantom and the lowest in the adult head phantom. The pencil chamber measurements generate larger D eq , α , and L eq values. (b) The AAPM method and the two Sedentex methods result in similar D eq , α , and L eq values for each patient group.

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of the three parameters D eq , L eq , and α from the AAPM fit in (a) Toshiba MSCT scanner and (b) i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner. (a) For each patient group, the D eq values from thimble chamber measurements are very close to each other, with the highest being present in the child head phantom and the lowest in the adult head phantom. The pencil chamber measurements generate larger D eq , α , and L eq values. (b) The AAPM method and the two Sedentex methods result in similar D eq , α , and L eq values for each patient group.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques:

    i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner: comparison of AAPM curves fitted using the central and peripheral dose measurements by the thimble chamber to the AAPM curves fitted using the CTDI w , Sedentex-DI1, and Sedentex-DI2 values calculated from dose measurements by the thimble chamber for the (a) adult, (b) adolescent, and (c) child head phantoms. All dose measurements are normalized to 100 mAs. The values of the three parameters D eq , L eq , and α are shown in <xref ref-type=Table 2(b) . " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner: comparison of AAPM curves fitted using the central and peripheral dose measurements by the thimble chamber to the AAPM curves fitted using the CTDI w , Sedentex-DI1, and Sedentex-DI2 values calculated from dose measurements by the thimble chamber for the (a) adult, (b) adolescent, and (c) child head phantoms. All dose measurements are normalized to 100 mAs. The values of the three parameters D eq , L eq , and α are shown in Table 2(b) .

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques: Comparison

    Comparison of D eq ′ s from the five AAPM fits in i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner. D eq , c and D eq , p are calculated from the AAPM equation [Eq. (2)] using the dose measurements taken in the central hole and the anterior hole by the thimble chamber, respectively. D eq , w , Sedentex-DI1 D eq , and Sedentex-DI2 D eq are calculated from the AAPM fit using the dose index values obtained from the CTDI w equation and the two SEDENTEXCT DI methods.

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of D eq ′ s from the five AAPM fits in i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanner. D eq , c and D eq , p are calculated from the AAPM equation [Eq. (2)] using the dose measurements taken in the central hole and the anterior hole by the thimble chamber, respectively. D eq , w , Sedentex-DI1 D eq , and Sedentex-DI2 D eq are calculated from the AAPM fit using the dose index values obtained from the CTDI w equation and the two SEDENTEXCT DI methods.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques: Comparison

    Summary of CTDI w , Sedentex-DI1, and Sedentex-DI2 values in Carestream 9300 and iCAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanners for adult, adolescent, and child. The CTDI w calculations result in the highest dose indices for the three FOVs in CS 9300 dental CBCT scanner. The three dose indices are very similar in i-CAT NG Dental CBCT scanner, with a difference of 0.2 mGy at most. All doses are measured by the thimble ionization chamber. All the dose indices are normalized to 100 mAs and expressed in mGy.

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of CTDI w , Sedentex-DI1, and Sedentex-DI2 values in Carestream 9300 and iCAT Next Generation dental CBCT scanners for adult, adolescent, and child. The CTDI w calculations result in the highest dose indices for the three FOVs in CS 9300 dental CBCT scanner. The three dose indices are very similar in i-CAT NG Dental CBCT scanner, with a difference of 0.2 mGy at most. All doses are measured by the thimble ionization chamber. All the dose indices are normalized to 100 mAs and expressed in mGy.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques:

    i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT anterior dose profiles with (a) L = 40 mm and (c) L = 130 mm , and center dose profiles with (b) L = 40 mm and (d) L = 130 mm for the adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms. Similar to <xref ref-type=Fig. 6 , inconsistency between theoretical and experimental dose values is primarily present at z = ± L / 2 . Specifically, variations occur at z = ± 20 mm for L = 40 mm and at z = ± 60 for L = 130 mm . Theoretical dose estimations are fairly consistent with experimental dose measurements within and beyond z = ± L / 2 . Dose profiles for 60-, 80-, 100-, and 110-mm scan lengths are not shown. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: i-CAT Next Generation dental CBCT anterior dose profiles with (a) L = 40 mm and (c) L = 130 mm , and center dose profiles with (b) L = 40 mm and (d) L = 130 mm for the adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms. Similar to Fig. 6 , inconsistency between theoretical and experimental dose values is primarily present at z = ± L / 2 . Specifically, variations occur at z = ± 20 mm for L = 40 mm and at z = ± 60 for L = 130 mm . Theoretical dose estimations are fairly consistent with experimental dose measurements within and beyond z = ± L / 2 . Dose profiles for 60-, 80-, 100-, and 110-mm scan lengths are not shown.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques:

    CS 9300 dental CBCT scanner center dose profiles along the z -axis with (a) L = 60 mm , (c) L = 110 mm , and (e) L = 135 mm , and anterior dose profiles with (b) L = 60 mm , (d) L = 110 mm , and (f) L = 135 mm cm for adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms.

    Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging

    Article Title: Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners

    doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CS 9300 dental CBCT scanner center dose profiles along the z -axis with (a) L = 60 mm , (c) L = 110 mm , and (e) L = 135 mm , and anterior dose profiles with (b) L = 60 mm , (d) L = 110 mm , and (f) L = 135 mm cm for adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms.

    Article Snippet: This study has examined three CT imaging scanners, including one common clinical MSCT scanner (Toshiba Aquilion TM One, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Tustin, California) and two dental CBCT scanners (i-CAT Next Generation CBCT, Imaging Sciences International, LLC, Hatfield, Pennsylvania and CS 9300 CBCT, Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, Georgia).

    Techniques: